Courtroom Clash: Judge Halts Biden’s Asylum Policy, Sparks Legal Showdown


FILE - Migrants wait to be processed after crossing the border, Jan. 6, 2023, near Yuma, Ariz. A federal judge on Tuesday, July 25, blocked a rule that allows immigration authorities to deny asylum to migrants who arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border without first applying online or seeking protection in a country they passed through. But the judge delayed his ruling from taking effect immediately to give the administration time to appeal. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)
Reading Time: 2 minutes

In a landmark ruling Tuesday, U.S. District Judge John S. Tigar put a hold on a Biden administration rule that sought to restrict asylum applications. The rule, criticized by migrant rights groups, requires migrants to apply for asylum online before reaching the U.S.-Mexico border or to first seek protection in the country they passed through.

The judge delayed the implementation of the ruling to allow the Biden administration to appeal.

Advocates hailed the judge’s decision, arguing that the rule contravened U.S. law guaranteeing the right to asylum regardless of entry method. They cited the inadequate capacity of the government’s CBP One app and concerns about migrants’ safety in transit countries like Mexico.

The administration, justifying the rule, highlighted that migrants should still access protection in other countries and via other pathways, like the CBP One app.

The judge noted the app’s appointments were far exceeded by demand, leaving many asylum seekers stranded in potentially dangerous situations.

Click play to listen to the report from AURN White House Correspondent Ebony McMorris. For more news, follow @E_N_McMorris & @aurnonline.

advanced divider
advanced divider