Supreme Court Reviewing South Carolina’s Redistricting Appeal Amid Allegations of Racial Gerrymandering

The core of the controversy revolves around allegations of racial gerrymandering, where approximately 30,000 Black voters were purportedly relocated to a different district, diminishing their collective voting strength.

by

FILE - The setting sun illuminates the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023. The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether South Carolina’s congressional districts need to be redrawn because they discriminate against Black voters. The justices said Monday they would review a lower-court ruling that found a coastal district running from Charleston to Hilton Head was intentionally redrawn to reduce the number of Black Democratic-leaning voters to make it more likely Republican candidates would win. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)
Reading Time: 2 minutes

The United States Supreme Court has taken up a contentious case involving South Carolina’s political boundaries, as state Republicans are appealing the withdrawal of a district held by Republican Nancy Mace of Charleston County following the 2020 census.

The core of the controversy revolves around allegations of racial gerrymandering, where approximately 30,000 Black voters were purportedly relocated to a different district, diminishing their collective voting strength. Critics assert this move violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits racial discrimination.

South Carolina Senate President Thomas Alexander, who is spearheading the appeal, contends that the redistricting was politically motivated, not racially driven. He has come under fierce opposition from civil rights groups such as the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, who maintain that the redistricting is a clear-cut example of racial gerrymandering.

State Sen. Dick Harpootlian, D-Columbia, compares his proposed map of U.S. House districts drawn with 2020 U.S. Census data to a plan supported by Republicans on Thursday, Jan. 20, 2022, in Columbia, S.C.. The full Senate was debating the maps. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Collins)

The Supreme Court’s decision on this case could potentially have a significant impact on the landmark Voting Rights Act, setting a precedent for future redistricting cases across the country. This case is being watched closely, as it may profoundly influence the fairness of representation in American politics moving forward.

While the outcome of the case is uncertain, it highlights the ongoing national debate over redistricting and the struggle to ensure equal representation for all citizens.


Click play to listen to the report from AURN White House Correspondent Ebony McMorris. For more news, follow @E_N_McMorris & @aurnonline.

advanced divider
advanced divider